Greek and Etruscan Architecture

Hellenic & Etruscan Architecture Grecian and Etruscan architecture began to take shape during the old and Early Classical periods. There were similarities surrounded by the early Grecian and Etruscan architectural styles, hardly there were far more differences. iodin of the most obvious similarities mingled with the Greek and Etruscan styles was the use of a gabled detonating device. A gabled roof resembles a triangle in that it has a meridian in the middle, and then has two straight slopes from the peak to each side wall.These roofs were often back up by the use of pillars or columns and is sheer in two Greek and Etruscan architecture. worry Greek synagogues, Etruscan temples also featured an intragroup chamber known as a cella. A cella is typically an enclosed charm room located in the midst of a temple. Many of the structures made during this age period were comprised of woodwind instrument or a mud-brick mixture, which is why there argon fewer structures tha t remain today.Beginning with the Classical period, Greek architects began to set themselves apart from Etruscan builders by use more durable materials like limest unity and marble to construct their temples and buildings. Greek temples were mostly make in the Doric or noodle tells, opus the Etruscans used the more early Tuscan order. The Doric and Ionic orders are really ornate, tokened, and aesthetically pleasing. They feature a column with a fluted design, which gives the pillar a thinner, taller, more elegant look.The Tuscan order on the early(a) hand, is a very unequivocal design and features columns with a simplistic base (foundation), capital (crown of the column) and frieze (horizontal section resting on top of the capital, save below the entablature). Etruscan pillars of the Tuscan order were often made of wood and did not have flutes. Some of the otherwise major differences betwixt Etruscan and Greek architecture can easily be seen when analyze the Greek Par thenon to an Etruscan temple.The Parthenon features a colonnade (row of columns) and stairs around the entire perimeter of the complex, while the typical Etruscan temple would have a colonnade and steps in the take care of the building only. The Parthenon also featured a one-room cella with two porches. One porch would lead into the cella and the other porch would lead out of the cella. Etruscan temples featured a three room cella with only one porch in the front. The final distinction between the Parthenon and a typical Etruscan temple would be in the artistic level of detail each one was designed with.The Etruscan temple was built in the very plain and basic Tuscan order, with no laurel wreath built into the actual structure itself, but multiple statues of gods placed on the roof of the temple. The Greek Parthenon however, was built in both the Doric and Ionic orders, with hundreds of lavishly change statues, figurines and figural reliefs built into the pediments (triangular se ction supra the entablature), metopes (a decorative band that fills the space between the frieze and the entablature), and frieze.